USCC Home
 
U.S. Chamber of Commerce Join Today
U.S. Chamber of Commerce
USCC Home Small Business Center Issues and Advocacy Media Center Chambers Associations Members

nav
ChamberCast Webcasts
Events Calendar
Issue Ads
Issue Experts
Op-eds
Photo Gallery
Press Releases
Radio Actualities
Speaking for Business
Speeches
Press Contacts
Join
navbottom

Related
About the U.S. Chamber of Commerce
Careers
FAQs
Programs
Publications
related_Bottom

Related
 
 
 
 
 
 
related_Bottom

 
Media Center > Press Releases > 2006 > August

CONTACTS: Linda Rozett/Brendan LaCivita
(202) 463-5337
 
Friday, August 25, 2006
 
National Chamber Litigation Center Seeks High Court Reversal of Two Antitrust Case Rulings
 
WASHINGTON, D.C.—In amicus briefs filed yesterday and today, the National Chamber Litigation Center (NCLC) asked the Supreme Court to reverse rulings in two important antitrust cases.
 
In Bell Atlantic Corporation, et al., v. Twombly, et al., NCLC argued that class action lawyers were not entitled to pursue massive litigation over completely unsupported claims that Bell Atlantic and three other telecommunications companies engaged in a conspiracy to eliminate competition and bolster prices by not entering into each other’s markets. The high court agreed to consider whether plaintiffs must do more than allege parallel conduct and tack on the word “conspiracy” in order to require defendants to incur significant discovery costs in defending an antitrust action.    
 
“Plaintiffs who make bare bones allegations of conspiracy should be tossed out of court at the pleading stage unless they can show an agreement to restrain trade,” said Robin Conrad, NCLC senior vice president. “Unless the Supreme Court takes action, companies faced with even merit-less antitrust claims will get stuck with huge legal bills or be coerced into settlements.”
 
In Weyerhaeuser Company v. Ross-Simmons Hardwood Lumber Co., Inc, NCLC argued that a verdict of predatory purchasing against Weyerhaeuser was incorrectly affirmed by the Ninth Circuit. In so doing, the court applied a liability standard that fails to provide any objective basis to distinguish a manufacturer’s legitimate and desirable competition to acquire raw materials from buying behavior that is truly predatory and anticompetitive.
 
“Failure to overturn the Ninth Circuit Court’s ruling will actually undermine the goal of antitrust laws by causing many businesses to compete less vigorously in order to avoid the risk of treble-damage antitrust liability,” said Conrad. “This case could reach far beyond the lumber industry and affect manufacturers in many other industries as well.”
 
NCLC, the public policy law firm of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, is a membership organization that advocates fair treatment of business in the courts and before regulatory agencies. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce is the world’s largest business federation representing more than 3 million businesses and organizations of every size, sector, and region.
 
Read the amicus briefs at /nclc/caselist/issues/Antitrust.htm.
      
# # #    
 
06-137

 This article is also available as an RSS Feed.

 
 
Join | Login | Search | Sitemap | Contact Us | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy
 
Copyright © 2009 U.S. Chamber of Commerce 1615 H St NW Washington DC 20062-2000 All Rights Reserved
Advancing human progress through an economic, political and social system based on individual freedom, incentive, initiative, opportunity, and responsibility.